Free PDF The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin, by Keith E. Stanovich
It is so very easy, isn't it? Why do not you try it? In this website, you can also find other titles of the The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich book collections that could be able to help you locating the very best solution of your task. Reading this publication The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich in soft data will additionally relieve you to obtain the resource easily. You may not bring for those publications to somewhere you go. Just with the gizmo that always be with your almost everywhere, you can read this publication The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich So, it will be so rapidly to complete reading this The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich
The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin, by Keith E. Stanovich
Free PDF The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin, by Keith E. Stanovich
Do you assume that reading is an important activity? Locate your reasons why including is necessary. Reviewing an e-book The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich is one part of enjoyable activities that will certainly make your life high quality better. It is not concerning simply exactly what kind of book The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich you read, it is not just concerning the amount of books you check out, it has to do with the routine. Checking out routine will be a means to make publication The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich as her or his good friend. It will certainly despite if they spend money and invest even more publications to finish reading, so does this book The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich
If you obtain the published book The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich in online book shop, you might likewise find the same trouble. So, you should relocate establishment to establishment The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich as well as search for the offered there. However, it will not happen below. The book The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich that we will provide right here is the soft data concept. This is exactly what make you can effortlessly locate as well as get this The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich by reading this site. We provide you The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich the best product, consistently and consistently.
Never ever question with our deal, since we will always provide exactly what you need. As similar to this upgraded book The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich, you might not find in the other area. However right here, it's extremely simple. Merely click and download and install, you could have the The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich When simpleness will alleviate your life, why should take the complex one? You can purchase the soft documents of the book The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich right here and be participant people. Besides this book The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich, you can likewise find hundreds lists of the books from many resources, collections, publishers, and writers in worldwide.
By clicking the link that we provide, you can take guide The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich perfectly. Link to web, download, and save to your device. What else to ask? Reading can be so simple when you have the soft file of this The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich in your device. You can also duplicate the documents The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich to your workplace computer system or in your home or even in your laptop. Simply share this good information to others. Suggest them to see this resource as well as obtain their hunted for publications The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning In The Age Of Darwin, By Keith E. Stanovich.
The idea that we might be robots is no longer the stuff of science fiction; decades of research in evolutionary biology and cognitive science have led many esteemed scientists to the conclusion that, according to the precepts of universal Darwinism, humans are merely the hosts for two replicators (genes and memes) that have no interest in us except as conduits for replication. Richard Dawkins, for example, jolted us into realizing that we are just survival mechanisms for our own genes, sophisticated robots in service of huge colonies of replicators to whom concepts of rationality, intelligence, agency, and even the human soul are irrelevant.
Accepting and now forcefully responding to this decentering and disturbing idea, Keith Stanovich here provides the tools for the "robot's rebellion," a program of cognitive reform necessary to advance human interests over the limited interest of the replicators and define our own autonomous goals as individual human beings. He shows how concepts of rational thinking from cognitive science interact with the logic of evolution to create opportunities for humans to structure their behavior to serve their own ends. These evaluative activities of the brain, he argues, fulfill the need that we have to ascribe significance to human life.
We may well be robots, but we are the only robots who have discovered that fact. Only by recognizing ourselves as such, argues Stanovich, can we begin to construct a concept of self based on what is truly singular about humans: that they gain control of their lives in a way unique among life forms on Earth—through rational self-determination.
- Sales Rank: #1327218 in Books
- Published on: 2005-10-15
- Released on: 2004-05-15
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 9.00" h x 1.40" w x 6.00" l, 1.10 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 374 pages
From Publishers Weekly
According to Stanovich, we're only just beginning to grapple with the deep consequences of Darwin's theory of natural selection. One such consequence, Richard Dawkins's theory of the "selfish gene," implies that living creatures are mere vehicles constructed to facilitate the survival and replication of genes. While Stanovich (How to Think Straight About Psychology), a cognitive scientist at the University of Toronto, agrees with the basic idea of the selfish gene, he finds fault with the conclusion that we are simply at its mercy. Drawing on recent research in cognitive science, he argues for an alternate conception of our relationship with our genes: we may be robots originally constructed as vehicles for genes, but our higher-level analytic reasoning abilities (themselves a product of evolution) enable us to rebel against our genetically programmed "autonomous set of systems," as well as the analogous cultural memes that infect our rational minds. Though framed as a revolutionary manifesto about how we can retain our autonomy and humanity if we are merely vehicles (robots) for genes and memes, this book is fundamentally a work of scholarship, bridging cognitive science and evolutionary psychology. As a consequence, though Stanovich's writing is clear, a reader without much background in these fields might find his argument quite difficult to follow at times, trading accessibility for a deep exploration of the philosophical and scientific ramifications of Darwinian evolution.
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Review
"Stanovich offers readers a sweeping tour of theory and research, advancing a programme of 'cognitive reform' that puts human interests first.... By making the point that cognition is optimized at the level of genes, not of individuals, Stanovich puts a fresh spin on the familiar claim that people are sometimes woefully irrational.... With The Robot's Rebellion, he sets himself apart from unreflective thinkers on both sides of the divide by taking evolutionary accounts of cognition seriously, even as he urges us to improve on what evolution has wrought." - Valerie M. Chase, Nature "According to Stanovich, we're only just beginning to grapple with the deep consequences of Darwin's theory of natural selection. One such consequence, Richard Dawkins's theory of the 'selfish gene,' implies that living creatures are mere vehicles constructed to facilitate the survival and replication of genes. While Stanovich...agrees with the basic idea of the selfish gene, he finds fault with the conclusion that we are simply at its mercy....A deep exploration of the philosophical and scientific ramifications of Darwinian evolution." - Publishers Weekly"
From the Inside Flap
The idea that we might be robots is no longer the stuff of science fiction; decades of research in evolutionary biology and cognitive science have led many esteemed scientists to the conclusion that, according to the precepts of universal Darwinism, humans are merely the hosts for two replicators (genes and memes) that have no interest in us except as conduits for replication. Richard Dawkins, for example, jolted us into realizing that we are just survival mechanisms for our own genes, sophisticated robots in service of huge colonies of replicators to whom concepts of rationality, intelligence, agency, and even the human soul are irrelevant.
Accepting and now forcefully responding to this decentering and disturbing idea, Keith Stanovich here provides the tools for the "robot's rebellion," a program of cognitive reform necessary to advance human interests over the limited interest of the replicators and define our own autonomous goals as individual human beings. He shows how concepts of rational thinking from cognitive science interact with the logic of evolution to create opportunities for humans to structure their behavior to serve their own ends. These evaluative activities of the brain, he argues, fulfill the need that we have to ascribe significance to human life.
We may well be robots, but we are the only robots who have discovered that fact. Only by recognizing ourselves as such, argues Stanovich, can we begin to construct a concept of self based on what is truly singular about humans: that they gain control of their lives in a way unique among life forms on Earth—through rational self-determination.
Most helpful customer reviews
38 of 44 people found the following review helpful.
A scientific and Creative Analysis of Human Potentials
By Herbert Gintis
Keith Stanovich is an accomplished behavioral scientist (psychologist) who applies all his scientific knowledge to answer a single question. We humans are the genetic product of hundreds of thousands of years of evolution, during most of which we lived as menial hunter-gatherers with a 35 year life expectancy. Given this genetic heritage, Stanovich asks, is there any way we can free ourselves from being the captives of our genetic pre-history?
The setting for this analysis is Richard Dawkins' argument in The Selfish Gene that we humans are "giant lumbering robots" who serve only as transient containers for our genes, who are the truly eternal replicators.
Stanovich makes the following arguments. First, there are two decision processes in the human brain. The first is the Autonomous Set of Systems (TASS) which we share with nonhuman animals, is a complete product of our evolutionary history, and only very imperfectly serves our contemporary interests. For instance, the TASS may tell us to overeat, have unsafe sex, or enjoy other forms of immediate gratification. However, there is a second decision center, which Stanovich calls 'analytical' that can override the TASS. This sounds like Freud's Id and Ego, which is one of Freud's unsullied contributions to human understanding. There is much evidence in favor of the TASS/analytical distinction.
Stanovich is to be praised for NEVER descending into the philosopher's morass, in which the question would be posed as one of 'free will.' I do not know if there is free will, but I do know the scientific evidence on which Stanovich's case is built.
The author's second thesis is that the same sociobiology that gave us selfish genes also seriously downgrades the importance of CULTURE in understanding human evolution and dynamics. Boy, is this ever true! His case is built up meticulously from a good knowledge of the contemporary research literature in the area, and is quite persuasive.
Stanovich's point is that the analytic brain can alter culture so as to overcome the biases of the TASS system, allowing humans to realize truly human and emancipatory goals. For instance, even though we all make elementary error in statistical decision-making (the brilliant work of Kahneman, Tversky, et al. shows this), experts can avoid the errors and can instruct others to do so as well.
But now comes Stanovich's third point: we cannot necessarily control culture so that it becomes an instrument of emancipation. According to memetic theory, we are as controlled by our memes (little nodules of culture) as we are by are genes. Stanovich does not manage to solve this problem, and suggests that we all be critically aware of the possibility that we adopt cultural practices that serve only to harm and constrain us. His list of rules for evaluation memes is quite useful and plausible.
I think the answer to Stanovich's problem is that the whole notion of memetics is rubbish. His defense of the notion in the book is uncharacteristically weak, to the point of being pathetic. For instance, he asserts that memetics itself is a meme complex, so if many people accept memetics and memetics is wrong, the memetics must be right! In fact, memetics posits behavior with no evolutionary justification. This is: we accept memes because they force themselves upon us. But, a creature who behaved in this way would be evolutionarily eclipsed by another who did not succumb.
The correct treatment of culture is that it is an epigenetic form of information transfer, and humans evolved to use it to enhance their fitness. The fact that sometimes we adopt harmful memes no more contradicts this than the fact that there are deleterious genetic mutation refutes Darwinism. This analysis is well developed in the research area of gene-culture coevolution, which I urge Stanovich to become (more) familiar with. It will open up vistas for him in pursuing his emancipatory project.
2 of 2 people found the following review helpful.
Jargon, essentially
By Simon Barrett 'Il Penseroso'
Psychologists shouldn't go messing with hard biological science, and they certainly shouldn't drag Darwin's name into it, otherwise they should be styled evolutionary psychologists - or simply philosophers. When we get on to so-called philosophy we encounter the purest mumbo jumbo ('the classically modernist quest to find one's truest personal identity', p226). Our identity finds us, what can 'true' possibly mean in this context, and as for 'classically modernist'..! What's modern is dissatisfaction with the self we're stuck with, and what we need, especially in the current grossly unfair economic climate, is more stoicism - but that would put a whole raft of people out of business
42 of 44 people found the following review helpful.
Partially a development from the work of Richard Dawkins
By Dennis Littrell
This book is largely about what psychologist Keith Stanovich sees as the disconnect in the postmodern world between "maximizing genetic fitness and maximizing the satisfaction of human desires." (p. xiii) On the one hand we have the "replicators," the genes that blindly seek only their replication. On the other hand we have the vehicle (the phenotype), i.e., "us," which carries the genes, which Stanovich believes should seek its own happiness. He sees our brain as composed of two overlapping, but sometimes divergent, systems. One, the more primitive, he calls "The Autonomous Set of Systems" (TASS) and the other he calls an "analytic system." He calls this having "two minds in one brain."
The autonomous system is held on a "short leash" by the genes while the analytic system is on a longer leash; that is, TASS reacts to events in the environment almost automatically in close concert with the dictates of the replicators while the analytic system is more removed from innate drives and can analyze situations rationally and can act in terms of what is good for the vehicle rather than what promotes the replication of the genes. Note that these systems usually are in agreement and react to the environment in the same way. Threats to the well-being of the vehicle from predators and other dangers, signal the same avoidance behavior. However, sometimes there is a conflict. The example that Stanovich uses is TASS's need to flirt with the boss's wife, which might increase the replication of the genes, while the analytic system realizes that such behavior probably goes against the best interests of the vehicle (possible loss of job, etc.). Following the counsel of the rational analytic system instead of the urgings of TASS is what Stanovich calls "maximizing goal satisfaction at the level of the whole organism." (p. 64)
The title of the book comes from Richard Dawkins (and indeed this book is written in partial reaction to and in concert with Dawkins's ideas) who called organisms "survival machines" and "gigantic lumbering robots" in his famous opus, The Selfish Gene (1976). Stanovich wants to free us from the dictates of those selfish genes and so has constructed a "robot's rebellion." He believes we can use our rationality (our analytic system) to override the sometimes self-destructive inclinations of the more primitive set of brain systems. Stanovich is preeminently a rationalist and believes that right thought leading to right behavior will lead to a more fulfilling and happier life for the "robots." We need to be on the long leash from the genes, not the short leash, is his idea.
A strong point that Stanovich makes very well is that in the information societies of the modern world many of the talents that served us well in the Environment of Evolutionary Adaptiveness in the Pleistocene are "worthless" when (e.g.) trying to use "an international ATM machine with which you are unfamiliar" or when "arguing with your HMO about a disallowed medical procedure." (p. 124) He argues strongly that corporations and governments, through their advertizing and propaganda, have become very good at exploiting blind spots in our more primitive brain systems and getting us to do what is good for them and not necessarily good for us. I think this is correct, and that those of us who can see how the players in the modern economy are trying to use us for their benefit will avoid most of the more obvious traps and thereby increase our standard of living and presumably our chances for happiness.
Stanovich devotes a chapter to criticizing evolutionary psychologists for failing "to develop the most important implication of potential mismatches between the cognitive requirements of the EEA and those of the modern world," as he carefully phrases it on page 131. Nonetheless the psychology presented here is mainly a synthesis of cognitive psychology, brain science and evolutionary psychology and as such represents the latest in our attempt to understand ourselves.
He also devotes a chapter to the effects that another kind of replicator, the meme, has on our lives. I don't have the space to go into his ideas about memes and their implications, but I want to say that from my point of view the word "meme" is an approximate neologism for the word "idea." However, I think that it is a useful coinage and, like Stanovich's mind dualism, facilitates a new way of looking at and talking about how our brains work.
While I think this is an extremely interesting book that goes a long way toward showing us the sort of thinking that characterizes postmodern psychology, I must point out that Stanovich's mind dualism is a construct that, while based on his interpretation of recent findings, is nonetheless just that: a construct that will be refined as time goes by and eventually overturned for a new construct. As always in science we are increasing our understanding and expanding our knowledge as we move toward a final understanding that will most likely always lie tantalizingly in the distance.
The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin, by Keith E. Stanovich PDF
The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin, by Keith E. Stanovich EPub
The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin, by Keith E. Stanovich Doc
The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin, by Keith E. Stanovich iBooks
The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin, by Keith E. Stanovich rtf
The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin, by Keith E. Stanovich Mobipocket
The Robot's Rebellion: Finding Meaning in the Age of Darwin, by Keith E. Stanovich Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar